Posts Tagged ‘God’

Source

Sunday, January 22nd, 2012

How one became many.
Source is singular. Source is Omnipresent. Like Taosit Thought that one became many it began as two (Yin and Yang).
Yin and Yang could be described as form (yang) and non form (yin).
Combined they are uniform (Source/Tao).

As Source continued to divide (more on this in an upcoming book) it subdivided from two (form and non form) into many.

For more jnana and spiritual wisdom pick up the book “Metaphysics of God and Cosmos” by Dr. Andrew Greszczyszyn. Now on sale for $2.00 as immeditate downloadable pdf or at Amazon.com/.ca/.uk

Lord Vs. God

Sunday, October 30th, 2011

To highlight what will be discussed in this post examine the following quote from Paramhansa Yogananda.

“God loves you just as much as He loves Krishnea, Jesus and the other great masters. You are a drop of the same ocean of Spirit. For the ocean is made up of all its drps. You are a part of God. You were given your importance by the Lord Himself. You are His very own”

The statement of God in this verse relates to Source. What Yogananda should have said was God loves you just as much as IT loves Krishna, Jesus and other great masters. This is because Source in consciousness niether male nor female (droping the HE loves).

Moving on. Should be clear you are made from the same spirit as God (you are consciousness). Source is Omnipresent. This means consciousness or Source is everything (including everything you, me, everything). In science this is shown through consciousness coming after Big Bang, and once read (The Metaphysics of God and Cosmos, Dr. Greszczyszyn) you’ll understand all ways that science, math and religion describe and demonstrate the conclusivity of Source (God).

The next statement Yogananda uses is very important. “You were given your importance (mission) by the Lord Himself. This is in contrary to God. Lord and God are not equivalent. Lord is male aspect of divinity. Shiva, Brahma, Vishnu (which are truly One).

It is this Lord otherwise said or read in scripture to be Father, that gave life to this system (Read Metaphysics of God and Cosmos, Greszczyszyn or Complete Chakra System by same author) and through reproducing with the consorts (Shakti, Lakshmi, Saraswatti, and others) gave life to all humans on earth.

For this reason it is said you are His own. By birth right you are descendant of this first Father, and as such he is meditating upon us all.

Therefore when reading through scripture and for the most part when hearing sermons, listening to the enlightented or writing think about this difference between Father/Lord Vs. God.

Prelude to Deathlessness

Saturday, May 28th, 2011

Along the path to deathlessness (formed light body that is immortal; this as opposed to formless non formed consciousness that has no desires) one has to finish his or her play (mission) before merging into Source (this while still alive).

By surrendering consciousness to Source (this through Nirvikalpa intention or desire) one become the “watcher” of Source (the actual true doer).

What does this mean for the individual? It means sitting behind (fully surrendered and only watching what your body, actions etc are being guided to do by Source).

While this may not sound impressive, fun desirous or even what should occur, at all heights of divinity it is what Source will do to everyone at one point of time or another when you have surrendered enough.

Either desires (achieving any desire) in formed form (light body that is deathless) or non desire (achieving non desires) in non form (consciousness or “spirit”).

While it is true that one could like JEsus be within everyone (Omnipresent which is higher chakra wise than mergence or surrendering of consciousness) and come back after death, having the option is higher (chakra 42…see The Complete Chakra System book by Dr. Andrew Greszczyszyn) and mergence (completion of mission; this surrendering consciousness to Source, similar to giving up free will though surrender of consciousness) in formed function (means deathlessness and achieving any desire), whereas non formed (means formless non spirit that does not come back or only comes back as light image when Source (now having merged or surrendered consciousness) brings you “back”) means non desires.

If you have not bought the book “The Complete Chakra System” by Dr. Andrew Greszczyszn, picking it up and reading it for maximal understanding of the conscious progression you are going through will help solidify understanding of this most important conscious progression.

Remember if you are not evolving here you are doing it in astral, causal, or some other physical locale within the cosmos. Why not take some of the steps here on earth and consciously surrender your consciousness (soul) to Source and finish your mission merging back into Source.

GODs’ Dilema

Friday, May 6th, 2011

COnceptually Source was formless and through formless became form.

What GOD does not want people to understand is how to merge back into Source of formlessness.

Why? GOD wants to experience totality/infinity.

What does this mean for you? Decide now if you want to continue suffering life after life, living in ways that promote desires which are not your own, rather GODS’ or decide instead to either become desireless and live in formless form, or acheive deathlessness and merge into SOurce in the way that Source will guide you, you being the watcher and GOD being the full doer.

Remember at the level of reality it is both what you deserve and why Source/GOD is playing the role of “hidding” himself from himself.

Causative Creation

Friday, March 11th, 2011

Is Creationism unscientific? Is there room for science within religion? Does science suggest there is no God?

Creationism is not unscientific. Although religions speak of God or Godhead as the Source which brought about creation, this does not mean that it is a God in the Sky or some tyrant or diplomate that establishes control in a non scientific manner. The source or Godhead is consciousness.

Consciousness much like energy allows science to be understood in all walks of life including religion. In the Begining was the Word. The Word was with God and the Word was God. John 1 (Holy Bible). As religion describes the begining there was AUM (consciousness and reverberation of consciousness). Hubble and science have witnessed that the entire cosmos is made up of one unique underlying sound. This is the religions AUM or Amen. Science also says the cosmos or particles and waves are Omnipresent (The Word or AUM was with GOD, meaning it was everywhere or Omnipresent) and the Word was GOD (God is Consciousness or AUM, the all-pervading Source of energy).

As you can see science not only supports God, but science an infant description of the cosmos (this far younger than religions which predate science by thousands of years) is continually making adjustment, reviews, and understanding that God or consciousness (albeit not a man in the sky) is the maker of Matter, cosmos and the entire cosmos.

What science lacks in understanding, religion and spirituality although using unscientific terms understood years before the “scientific” findings occurred or will occur. For this reason it could be said that spirituality or the use of science and it descriptions could very well be the seventh and final major world religion.

Is there a Source or Godhead?

Friday, November 19th, 2010

A question like this begins with questions-Why am I here?, What am I here for? How or what created me? Why is there evil? And what is the relationship of civilization with moral and conscience ascriptions?

Justice, morals, ethics, freedom. This is not God. Peaces, bliss, enlightenment. This is not God.

If these are not God what is God?

Consciousness and formless energy. This is God, Godhead or Source.

As everything in this cosmos was formed from energy and energy which is conscious (having properties, eventually which can be measured, detailed, explained and contained) it is this Source of cosmic creation that all religions try to speak of.

Is Jesus, Babaji, Shiva, Lakshmi or even Buddha a God? While it may seem like Shiva is a God and Jesus, Buddha or Babaji are not, truly they all encompass what it means to be divine.

As consciousness expands (like Darwins theory on evolution) and one becomes more able to consciously manifest the awareness of Source, how to alter matter and why Source develops Gods’ all become recognizable, understandable and easy to achieve.

Something that has to be understood is there is a Source or Godhead although the nature of this Identity is not something that is personable like a man in the sky, something or someone you”ll meet when you die, or even some dictator that creates or doesn’t create.

As soon as you give a characteristic (yes even the arbitrary Omnipotency, Omniscience, Omnitemporal and even at times Omnipresent-although hard to theorize or understand fully) to this Source it becomes dependant not on Source but some arbitrary dualitic principle. This is not Pure Source. Source is devoid (although can become dualistic when given a characteristic) of duality. It is neither male, nor female, neither up nor down, not in nor out, or even black or white. It is almost like the prism which refracts white light creating a multitude of rainbow colours (although it would not be white light as this is a characteristic).

Does this mean that God, Godhead or Source is somehow not alive? As science and even religion understands Source is much alive. Energy or consciousness (the purity of form) is wisdom, intelligence, creativity, beauty, innate and even power. The most perfect description of Source is Perfection.

Source does not die, is not damaged, can not be bruised, is not consumed, can create/maintain/destroy, is able, manifests, knows what to do, and is not dependant on anything.

Science uses the term consciousness or energy, while religion uses the concept of God. While it does not matter if it is a term to relate to atheism or a term to invoke spirituality the nature of Consciousness although harder to navigate, control, understand, measure or even evoke is still testable, measurable, understandable and evokable by man, science, religion and even nature.

Paramahansa Yogananda Quote

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

“There are always two forces warring against each other within us”

Is this Good VS. Bad? Is this Ego and Id? Is this Satan VS. God?

So much has been talked about in this principle. Although so much has been talked about, is there something that could truly give maximal understanding to Yogananda’s statement that two forces are waggering war within us?

The necessisity to understand that Source or GOD (Allah/Tao/YHWH/Godhead) is your higher self also teaches that things like MAterialism, Habits, Seven deadly sins or even Satan have less truth than the providence that there is a balance between Yin and Yang. This duality or dicotomy is the essence of not just male and female or Good versus Evil (Satan Vs. God) it is the discriminating faculty of right versus wrong.

At times there is need to kill. At times there is need to not kill. Could all killing be labeled as evil? Can not killing in necessity or in protective need be considered good?

It is this right versus wrong or discriminating of yes vs. no that is the true sense of what two forces are working within Man at all times.

What makes something karmic is not a sense of evil or not evil. Karma is both good karma and bad karma. Karma is karma. Just as karma is not evil or good, right versus wrong is only a choice and GOD which is beyond dualities is not magically all Good.

What may seem good to one person is far from being good or Godly to another. While this may be new, fire and brimestone or even “Satanic” heresay the reality is all aspects of Source are based on four characteristics (Omnipresence, Omniscience, Omnipotency, and Omnitemporal). It is these four characteristics that make any individual who has developed spirituality to that level to be considered one with GOD.

Could Krishna, Jesus or Buddha be any less Godly should they have killed someone that tried attacking them? While Jesus choose to allow himself to become martyred would people think of him differently if he choose to have gotten out or while getting out and breaking free punch a man who happened to die.

While it seems bizzare, godliness is dependant on more than Good versus Evil. As Source or Consciousness knowns perfection (both evil and good) it is this state of perfection than godliness or those who have become One with Source through their perfection and attainment of (omnipotency, omnipresence, omnitemporal and omniscience) are not doing non evil or pure good, what they are doing is acting in accordance with perfection.

In this way do not question a god or decide that something a Source developed God said, did or tried was not good or right. Working as consciousness and perfection what may have been right for the situation may have been an act which some or even many could consider evil.

Does this seem fair? Does Source or God mean anything less than Creator?

How to Thank God

Monday, October 11th, 2010

Not a question of when, or why but how. God should be thanked for everything that comes into your life.

A good way to begin is to take 30 minutes either on a weekend or a weekday evening and sit in contemplation (meditation). Begin to think of all the things you are or should be thankful for. This should take longer than a 30 minute interval (health, family, relationships, education, money/finances, area of living, security, etc.). Even if it is not “optimal” by your standards the idea is to realize it is still greater than it could be.

Learning lessons (Hardships, disapointments, setbacks, pain and struggles) also should be thanked. These key “setbacks” are stepping stones to higher more evolved situations. Thanks for them!

The next time you do it you can begin from conception to present day. The major high points (good and bad) and then finer and finer points. Maybe make it a scheduled appointment every week, setting aside a space in the week for Thanks.

After this every time you do something acknowledge by giving thanks. Do this with eveything that is happening in your life. In this way graces will descend. You will feel more loving, more at peace and more dependant on Source (God).

Agastyar

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Agastyar

Agastyar

Agastyar disciple and God. How is this possible? One has to fully comprehend the nature of cosmic Source to know that God is your Soul. Although there is Source (God) the reality is that expression of self (higher self) can be embodied in a way that God the Source shines through. In this way the little god (Soul) manifesting with the big God (Source) creates a divine persona (Agastyar, Shiva, Babaji, Bogananthar, or any of the other Siddhas, demi God or Maha Devas).

Just as Agastyar is a God, due to the nature of God’s (Sources) expression of developing the human (the human surrendering to Source/God) it is the nature of polytheisim (One into Many) which does not take away from Montheism (One Source). Even with many Gods (all various expressions of God) both polythesism (many Gods) and monotheism (One God) co exist.

Four Arms

Friday, February 26th, 2010

God

God

A quick examination of the semblance of Gods and Goddess’s reveals what can only be described as four armed beings.

Insight and logic suggests if Gods and Goddess’s would also be human, four arms seems impossible or Gods and Goddess’s must “grow” extra limbs through spiritual evolution.

What should be understood, and something gained through higher revelation, realization and intuition is that Gods and Goddess’s four limbs are symbolic.

Although there is much in the way of explaining the symbology of Shiva’s ornaments or Lakshmi’s (as well as the other Gods) ornamants they hold in the four hands, it is the meaning of the number four (four hands) that is significant.

Why four? Four unlike seven is not numerologically a divine or Godly number. Why then the number four?

Four is a highly significant number in the path to godliness. Chakras 39, 40, 41 and 42 are the four chakras responsible for Godliness.

Chakra 39: Omnipresence
Chakra 40: Omniscience
Chaka 41: Omnipotency
Chakra 42: Omnitemporal

It is the unlocking and spiritual development of these four chakras that leads to the four characteristics of the Soul which is God (the inner dwelling consciousness and energy which gives power, energy and sustains and brings with it spiritual enlightenment and design) that are the four characteristics of God.

God being everpresent, all knowing, all powerful, and everlasting, is also reflective of both the Soul (which is God) and the Gods and Goddess that have realized this level of divinity. What better way to portray Gods and Goddess other than symbolically representing them using their four “limbs”.